Page 35 - OCC-Annual-Report-2017-SPREADS
P. 35

2017 Case Activity                                                         2017 Case Activity



 Case Number  Party  Consumer Impact  Case Number  Party  Consumer Impact  Case Number  Party  Consumer Impact  Case Number  Party  Consumer Impact
 2017-0204  Dayton Power   Appeal was filed in early 2017. This appeal   RM16-23  Electric Storage  FERC's proposal in this case is to amend   17-2202-GA-ALT  Columbia Gas   Columbia is seeking to charge customers   17-0820-GA-ATA  Dominion   Dominion sought pre-approval from the
 & Light ESP I   challenged the rates the PUCO approved   Participation  its regulations to remove barriers to   of Ohio  for certain capital expenditures it   Energy Ohio  PUCO to reserve capacity on a pipeline that
 (08-1094-EL-  after allowing DP&L to withdraw from its   the participation of Distributed Energy   has deferred. The estimated deferred   could serve customers in the Ashtabula
 SSO et al)  electric security plan. Included in the rates   Resources in markets. Distributed Energy   investment costs to be collected from   area. OCC advocated that consumers
 were stability charge subsidies. A decision   Resources are electrical generation and   customers requested by Columbia are   should not have to pay because, among
 is expected in 2018.  storage performed by a variety of small   $666.4 million.           other reasons, Dominion was seeking pre-
 2013-2026  FirstEnergy   On appeal to the Supreme Court OCC argued   grid-connected devices. Distributed   17-2118-GA-AAM  Duke Energy-  Duke is seeking authority to defer and later   approval of a project with unknown costs
 Alternative   that FirstEnergy overcharged customers   Energy Resources can include solar panels,   Ohio, Inc.  collect from customers, $3 million it paid   whose prudency had not been established.
 Energy Rider   for renewable energy by purchasing   electricity storage (e.g., batteries), small   to help the City defray costs for a retaining   The PUCO disagreed and approved
 Appeal  renewable energy credits at above market   natural gas-fueled generators, electric   wall. It is alleged that a retaining wall was   Dominion’s request.
 prices from one of its affiliates. OCC also   vehicles, etc.  needed after a landslide threatened City   17-0782-GA-RDR  Vectren Energy   Vectren seeks to update its energy
 appealed the PUCO’s treatment of alleged   ER16-372-004  PJM Fuel Cost  FERC proposed changes to the rules and   water and sewer lines, and that it could   Delivery of   efficiency rider charges. The rate that
 protected materials. The utility also appealed   policies in PJM's energy markets that   affect some of Duke's gas pipes. PUCO   Ohio, Inc.  residential customers pay will increase by
 the PUCO’s $43 million disallowance of   could allow market participants to alter   approval of the deferral request would   about 33% as approved by the PUCO.
 costs. The Court reversed the PUCO on   energy prices away from the competitive   mean that customers would likely have   17-0690-GA-RDR  Duke Energy-  Duke seeks to update its natural gas smart
 the treatment of protected materials and   market price.  to pay the $3 million plus interest to Duke   Ohio, Inc.  grid costs. OCC asked the PUCO to engage
 remanded for further PUCO review. The   in future rates. In comments filed, OCC           in a more detailed analysis of natural gas
 Court also overturned the PUCO on the $43   opposed the utility’s request. The PUCO       smart grid spending, but the PUCO did not
 million disallowance, finding that the PUCO   Natural Gas Cases at the    Staff also recommended that the request   adopt OCC's recommendation. Most Duke
 engaged in retroactive ratemaking. That   Public Utilities Commission of Ohio  be denied. The PUCO has not ruled.  residential customers pay approximately
 ruling by the Court puts customers in danger   17-1905-GA-ORD  PUCO - Gas   OCC argued that benefits of projects   $0.80 per month towards the gas smart
 of having to pay for costs even if they are   17-2374-GA-RDR  Columbia Gas   Columbia gas seeks to update rates   Rulemaking  funded by consumers through economic   grid costs.
 not prudently incurred. OCC is addressing   of Ohio  for its energy efficiency (demand side   development riders should outweigh costs
 the implications of that ruling by advocating   management) programs and infrastructure   and be verified by the PUCO.  17-0596-GA-RDR  Duke Energy-  Duke seeks to update its charges
 for tariff language that explicitly makes   replacement program. (IRP). The IRP   Ohio, Inc.  to customers for remediation of its
 collection subject to refund.  charge proposed for the residential   17-1372-GA-RDR  Dominion   Dominion filed adjustments to its energy   manufactured gas sites. The Ohio Supreme
 customer is $8.91 per month, a reduction   Energy Ohio  efficiency charges to be collected from its
 of $0.05 from the current rate, primarily   customers. The PUCO issued an order finding   Court found, earlier this year, that Duke
                                                                                           could continue to charge customers for
 Electricity Cases at the    due to the effect of the new tax law. The   that Staff’s audit report be adopted and   these costs. This update adds $1,296,160
 Demand Side Management component of
 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission  that rider charge to customers will increase   Dominion must file an application to adjust   to the remediation costs and $1.92 to the
                                       its Demand Side Management rider rate
 RM18-1  Grid Reliability   This case deals with the Secretary of   the bill by $1.88 per month for a residential   annually. The PUCO Staff recommended   residential customer’s monthly bill.
 & Resilience   Energy's request that FERC implement rules   customer using 10 Mcf.  that Dominion file a more detailed annual   17-0594-GA-ALT  Suburban   This case involves Suburban's request
 Pricing  regarding fuel reliability and resilience. The   17-2358-GA-WVR  Direct Energy   The marketers want to avoid using an   application, which OCC supports.  Natural Gas   to start charging consumers under a
 case deals primarily with whether certain   Services, LLC,   independent third party to verify enrollment   Company  straight-fixed variable rate design. This
 fuel sources (coal and nuclear plants)   Direct Energy   of consumers who call the marketers. OCC   17-1197-GA-ATA,   Duke Energy-  This case deals with Duke's request to   rate design imposes relative higher
 should be subsidized by customers. OCC   Business, LLC,   opposes the marketers’ attempt to avoid   17-1198-GA-IDR  Ohio, Inc.  implement a mechanism to charge   charges on low-use customers. The PUCO
 urged FERC not to authorize subsidies   Dominion   compliance with PUCO rules that protect   customers for costs to subsidize economic   approved this rate design in prior cases for
 because they harm markets and the   Energy   consumers who change their natural gas   development projects through the   all the major gas companies. In view of
 customers who rely on markets to bring   Solutions, Inc.,  supplier over the telephone.  infrastructure development rider.  this history, OCC notified the PUCO of its
 them reasonably priced electric service.
 Interstate Gas   17-1139-GA-AIR,   Ohio Gas   This case deals with Ohio Gas Company's     decision not to contest Suburban’s request
 RM17-2  Uplift Cost   FERC proposed to revise its regulations   Supply, Inc.,   17-1140-GA-ATA,   Company  request to increase the rate it charges   while expressing its opposition to the SFV
 Allocations  concerning uplift. Uplift refers to payments   and SouthStar   17-1141-GA-AAM  consumers for natural gas service. Ohio   rate design. Suburban’s application was
 that a regional grid operator makes to a   Energy   Gas, OCC, and PUCO Staff entered into a   approved by the PUCO.
 generation resource whose commitment and   Services, LLC  settlement, which was approved by the   17-0521-GA-IDR  Columbia Gas   This case deals with Columbia's request
 dispatch result in a shortfall between the   17-2284-GA-SLF  Vectren Energy   This case deals with whether Vectren must   PUCO in February 2018. The settlement   of Ohio  to increase the rate it charges consumers
 costs in the resource’s offer and the revenue   Delivery of   give certain customer information to a   decreased Ohio Gas’s original rate increase   under its Infrastructure Development Rider.
 earned through market clearing prices.   Ohio, Inc.  certified retail natural gas supplier that   proposal to address the new federal
 FERC’s proposal in this case was to allocate   has not been approved by the utility to   corporate income tax rate established by   17-0220-GA-EXR,   Vectren Energy   This case deals with financial audits
 such uplift costs to those market participants   participate in its retail choice program. OCC   the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. Ohio Gas   17-0320-GA-UEX,  Delivery of   of various charges to customers under
 whose transactions are reasonably expected   intervened in the case to protect consumers   customers are the first utility customers   17-0420-GA-PIP  Ohio, Inc.  Vectren's tariffs (Exit Transition Cost
 to have caused the costs.  from giving gas suppliers unlawful access   in Ohio to receive the benefit of an offset   Rider, Uncollectible Expense Rider, and
 to their private information.         to their utility rates to reflect the recent        Percentage of Income Payment Plan Rider).
                                       decrease in the federal income tax rate
                                       which resulted in savings of over $600,000
                                       per year for customers or around $1.00 per
                                       customer per month.



 32   Office of the Ohio Consumers’ Counsel                                                   Annual Report 2017   33
   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40